I won’t yet use the word “vindicated”…
But as eagle-eyed Prof. Muller says “The jury may not be in, but they’re knocking on the door.”
In that last message, Malkin explains that she is in Minneapolis, where she’ll be giving a speech at 12:00 noon. Controlling for the one-hour time difference between the East Coast and Minnesota, I infer that she posted this update a startling 29 minutes before her noontime speech.
Update: Glad I didn’t use that word I wasn’t going to use yet, yet. It appears Prof. Muller miscalculated some flight times etc.
In a way, that’s kind of a blow to the “quit focusing so much attention on this” crowd. How much attention could it have been?
;)
Uhm. She posted at 8:25, likely as she was waiting to take off, and at 12:31, after having landed. That’s more than enough time to get to Minneapolis, and there is even a flight from DC to Minneapolis in that time segment — Northwest Airlines Flight 557. Departed DC at 8:56 and arrived 11:40.
Comment by Sheesh — April 4, 2006 @ 10:09 pm
That comment section doesn’t leave much hope for the human race, does it?
Comment by eb — April 5, 2006 @ 12:01 am
I strongly suggest that you cease this line of investigation immediately. We certainly don’t mind you poking around the edges and making a little noise, but this is too close for comfort. Our representatives will be in touch shortly.
Comment by Halliburton Public Relations — April 5, 2006 @ 1:49 am
You’re running word press and you don’t do trackbacks? Whatever. Anyway, click here.
Comment by John — April 5, 2006 @ 3:57 am
Oh, just came by to see if you were on this yet.
Comment by Gavin M. — April 5, 2006 @ 5:22 am
A whole blog devoted to parsing Michelle Malkin? Very disturbing. Get some help dude…
Comment by Mick Stockinger — April 5, 2006 @ 5:55 am
Maybe it’s just me, but perhaps someone who publishes a massive book rewriting history and advocating internment in record time, only to follow it up with a juvenile piece about ‘unhinged liberals’ the size of a comic book, and whose editor was recently discovered to be a plagiarist - deserves a little bit of scrutiny. Why does it seem to always be conservatives that are shocked and appalled that there are sites like this? For every malkin(s) watch there’s a moore watch to “watch every move” of the left. It’s an inherent part of the internet in general and blogs in particular. Fucking deal with it.
Comment by bvac — April 5, 2006 @ 6:39 am
bvac > You’re forgetting Rule #1. If the Right does it, it’s okay and damn you for questioning it. If the Left does it, it’s “unhinged,” and damn you if you support it.
Hypocritical, yes, but hardly surprising. I’ve long ago stopped trying to understand Right-wing “logic”.
Comment by eb — April 5, 2006 @ 7:16 am
eb>
It’s not their fault. Logic and genuine thought have been replaced with sophistry. The goal is not to inform, only to persuade. The person who finds it shocking to see a blog dedicated to dissecting the writings of an unfortunately influential right-wing blogger has no interest in ideas and information, only persuasion and manipulation.
Republicans like to say they are the party of ideas. Ideas are dynamic constructive processes unique to human beings. Privatizing vital functions of government and letting corporations take care of everything is not an idea, and corporations are not human beings. I digress.
Comment by bvac — April 5, 2006 @ 7:50 am
I’m still waiting for righties to decide once and for all whether I’m a self-aggrandizing fame-seeker hungry for recognition or a cowardly troll hiding behind my anonymity. (Well, pseudonymity, to be exact.)
Comment by Auguste — April 5, 2006 @ 6:38 pm
Michelle is a good 12 years younger than I am. Yet, in her rebuttal of the prof’s timeline, she refers to the flight attendant as a stewardess. That term went out in the ’70s, before Michelle was born, I imagine.
Comment by thelma — April 6, 2006 @ 5:14 pm
Michelle is a good 12 years younger than I am. Yet, in her rebuttal of the prof’s timeline, she refers to the flight attendant as a stewardess. That term went out in the ’70s, before Michelle was born, I imagine.
So?
Comment by John — April 6, 2006 @ 7:26 pm
I think Eric put his foot in his mouth so to speak on this one, but Michelle was way out of line referring to him as “creepy” on her web site. The word conjures up images of trench coat wearing low lifes flashing little girls at the playground.
Eric had the decency to publicly apologize on his web site for his mistake. Michelle should apologize for the “creepy” slander.
Comment by Tommykey — April 6, 2006 @ 10:58 pm