I bet you I can write a post that will make Auguste’s head explode.
With exactly zero new facts and a little conjecture on the part of a single bomb-squad member, Malkin declares Joel Hinrichs a wild-eyed American jihadist, again. And when I say zero new facts, I mean just that. There’s not even enough in the post to counterargue, it’s so spectacularly structurally unsound.
Update: Cam in comments:
Curiously, in her exhaustive research, Malkin seems to have missed some of Sgt. Mauldin’s other remarks. The OU Daily covered the same presentation, and it addressed the “Islamic connection” directly: “The suspicions of an Islamic connection were shown to be false, Mauldin said.”…
An honest oversight, I’m sure.
What else could it be?