February 20, 2006

People are talking

by Auguste at 10:03 pm and filed under: Breaking the fourth wall

Rave reviews for Malkin(s)watch! (Courtesy Babelfish):

The Angelos has right in the comments of previous post: what I attributed in intolerance, ignorance and neosyntiritjke’s convictions (all things where sjhaj’nomaj but consider end pa’ntwn agnoy’s objectives) is actually Olympic age-group propaganda. See here one extensive xempro’stjasma. Things that promotes the lady: under the environment, I ask the camps of concentration, “O Saint Mpoys”.
Anyway, I take behind “ancypogkomenj’djo”? because the photograph in mplogk plays it is before 300 years.

Can the money be far behind?

Update: I’ll at least take some groupies. Male, female, it’s all flattering.

7 Comments

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://malkinwatch.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/people-are-talking/trackback/

  1. Well, how DARE you engage in “olympic age-group propaganda”!

    Or something.

    My head hurts.

    Comment by Pere Ubu — February 20, 2006 @ 10:51 pm

  2. It’s embarrassing to admit that in college I took a semester and a half of Greek, and as a result can just about pronounce about half the words in the original post. Higher education - worth every penny!

    Comment by Auguste — February 20, 2006 @ 10:53 pm

  3. Auguste,

    You don’t seem to have weighed in the port security topic yet. The general consensus seems to be that selling out our port security to a terrorist-friendly foreign entity is a bad thing. Hillary and Malkin even agree. And Schumer agrees with both of them. What’s your take?

    Comment by John — February 21, 2006 @ 3:49 am

  4. John, my first reaction when Malkin first posted the story was that I tend to agree. But those instances in which I agree with Malkin on first blush have begun to give me pause, thinking there’s going to be a catch - and then I left for the beach the next day. (as a side note, for some reason, Blogsome seems determined to stick to GMT and so anything I post after 4 pm my time shows up as the next day…)

    Hillary’s not really my bellweather for an issue, despite what the right seems to think about liberals these days…but all those qualifiers aside, I think Malkin and Hillary are probably right - it’s a little scary.

    That said, there’s a lot of other problematic nations with problematic investments in United States infrastructure, and aside from the Google attacks, nobody’s really rocking the boat with China, for example.

    Comment by Auguste — February 21, 2006 @ 4:52 am

  5. Auguste, here’s some stuff to look at on this topic. You’d better address it because Malkin has been going on and on about it.

    http://www.aqoul.com/archives/2006/02/ports_prejudice.php#more
    http://dennisthepeasant.typepad.com/dennis_the_peasant/2006/02/playing_the_mus_1.html
    http://dennisthepeasant.typepad.com/dennis_the_peasant/2006/02/playing_the_mus_2.html

    Comment by jade — February 21, 2006 @ 5:20 pm

  6. Seen Malkin’s latest?

    “Reader Frank G. wonders: “Where are the violent protests over the bombing of the famous mosque in Samarra”

    If only she could access the news eh.

    Comment by sonic — February 22, 2006 @ 9:57 pm

  7. Have closed comments due to endless comment spam.

    Comment by Auguste — May 6, 2006 @ 5:26 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






















Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Hadley Wickham