Rave reviews for Malkin(s)watch! (Courtesy Babelfish):

The Angelos has right in the comments of previous post: what I attributed in intolerance, ignorance and neosyntiritjke’s convictions (all things where sjhaj’nomaj but consider end pa’ntwn agnoy’s objectives) is actually Olympic age-group propaganda. See here one extensive xempro’stjasma. Things that promotes the lady: under the environment, I ask the camps of concentration, “O Saint Mpoys”.
Anyway, I take behind “ancypogkomenj’djo”? because the photograph in mplogk plays it is before 300 years.

Can the money be far behind?

Update: I’ll at least take some groupies. Male, female, it’s all flattering.

Academic rigor:

In the question-and-answer session, a student asked Malkin if these hoaxes she described were representative stories.

“For every one that is faked, dozens are true,” the student said.

“There’s a lot less than you might think,” Malkin responded. “A lot of stats are hyped.”

She added that a lot of “under reporting” occurs with regard to fake hate crimes.

Asked for a percentage on exactly how many hate crimes might be fake, Malkin said, “I can’t put a percentage on it…This is about a psyche. It deserves greater scrutiny…I wish a sociologist would take up this field.”

It has to be true - I wrote a book about it!

She told the audience that once, in kindergarten, she came home crying because she was called a racist name.

“My mom wiped my tears…and told me everyone has prejudice,” she said. “I am eternally grateful for this [lesson].”

Oh, I see. Everyone has prejudice, but many hate crimes are faked. And speaking of fake hate crimes…

Reading from her notes, bodyguard standing in front of her, Malkin recounted tales of Oberlin students seeing racism in situations that to her were not racist at all.

Oh? Situations like this?